Historic Preservation Fund Gutted

These funds are vital to the preservation that happens every day in New York State. Unfortunately, FY 2025 funds have not been released to SHPOs, THPOs, and competitive grant programs under the HPF, leaving offices short of funds and preservation projects stalled, despite being appropriated by Congress. In addition, the President’s proposed budget seeks to eliminate the HPF almost entirely. This is a complete abandonment of states who are tasked with implementing important parts of the National Historic Preservation Act. This is in addition to cuts and staff reductions at the National Park Service itself.

Please reach out directly to your members of Congress and tell them that we need to release FY 2025 funds for SHPOs, THPOs and competitive grants, and ensure a strong appropriation for the Historic Preservation Fund in the FY 2026 budget.

Specific calls to action and how-to’s from Preservation Action:

1.Reach out to your members of Congress and ask them to help facilitate the immediate approval of the FY25 Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) for the Historic Preservation Fund and subsequent review and approval of applications.

• These funds are urgently needed to ensure the work of SHPOs and THPOs continues to aid in the preservation of our nation’s heritage

• Without prompt funding State and Tribes will be forced to eliminate federally-required staff – jeopardizing billions in investment

• Share the Historic Preservation Under Threat one-pagers with your members of Congress and let them know how these funding delays are impacting your state and community! This is especially important if your members are on the House or Senate Appropriations Committee.

• If you have personal contact in your Representative or Senator’s office, reach out to them directly. If you need any help finding staff contacts, feel free to reach out to Rob Naylor at Preservation Action (rnaylor@preservationaction.org). 

2.Ask your Representatives to sign onto the FY26 House Historic Preservation Fund Dear Colleague Letter. This bipartisan letter is being circulated by Rep. Mike Turner (R-OH) and Rep. Teresa Leger Ferrnandez (D-NM), and requests $225 million for the HPF – the same amount advocated for during Advocacy Week. The deadline for signatures is COB Thursday, May 15.

• Offices can sign-on by using the internal Quill link (this is for internal House use only) or by reaching out to Clare Pavell at Clare.Pavell@mail.house.gov in Rep. Turner’s office or Mark Zientek at Mark.Zientek@mail.house.gov in Rep. Leger Fernandez’s office. 

• Review the FY26 House HPF Dear Colleague Letter and learn more here. Stay tuned for more details coming soon on a Senate letter.

• Check out our action campaign to easily personalize and send a letter to your Representative today!

The Historic Preservation Fund (HPF), funded by Outer Continental Shelf oil and gas lease revenues, provides financial assistance to states, tribes, territories, local governments, and nonprofits. HPF grants are awarded annually to State Historic Preservation Offices based on an apportionment formula for their work in fulfilling their responsibilities under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 and includes a 10% pass-through of HPF grant funds to directly support local preservation projects and provide preservation training and guidance. This includes the administration of the Certified Local Governments Program (CLG), survey and inventory of historic resources, preparing National Register nominations, review and compliance under Section 106, and administering the preservation tax credit program. In New York, this Federal appropriation is around $1.7 million, the third-highest operational grant in the nation.

In addition to annual formula grants given to states, the HPF has also funded competitive grant programs including, African American Civil Rights Grants, Save Americas Treasures Grants, Paul Bruhn Historic Revitalization Grants, Underrepresented Communities Grants, and others.  

Important Changes to the NYS Historic Tax Credit Program

We want to thank Governor Kathy Hochul and the NYS Legislature for their leadership in making important improvements to the NYS Rehabilitation Tax Credit Program during the creation of the FY2026 budget. Sentor Brian Kavanagh and Assemblymember Carrie Woerner championed the legislation in their respective houses. These changes make the historic tax credit an even more powerful tool for the creation of affordable housing and community revitalization in New York State.

Specifically, the new legislation makes two important changes to the program.

1.       Allows for transfer of the NYS Historic Tax Credit. This will increase the pool of eligible tax credit investors and thereby increase the value of the credits, meaning more money for projects.

2.       Removes the current requirement that tax credit projects must be in a census tract at or below the state median family income if the project creates affordable housing. This further strengthens the indispensable role that preservation plays in providing housing.

Special thanks to our colleagues and to the NYS Association for Affordable Housing for their partnership in advocating for this program!

Co-Sponsors Needed for HTC-GO

The updated language for the Historic Tax Credit Growth and Opportunity Act [HTC-GO (H.R. 2941/S. 1459)] has been introduced in Congress and the proposed changes would be a tremendous improvement over the current program. Co-sponsored by Representative Tom Suozzi (D-NY 3) in the House, the legislation would add more muscle to the program in smaller, rural communities, make rehab credits available to more projects, incentivize housing development and increase the value of the credit to investors overall.

Our national partners at Preservation Action are asking all of us to encourage our representatives in Congress to sign on as co-sponsors of this important legislation. This is all happening very quickly, so your outreach is important now.

Here is an HTC-GO Fact Sheet put together by Preservation Action with more information on the bill that you can share with offices as well as their Action Alert.

This Advocacy Alert is reposted from our colleagues at Preservation Action. Click here for Preservation Action’s HTC-GO one-pager .

---

Advocacy Alert: Urge Your Members of Congress to Cosponsor the Historic Tax Credit Growth and Opportunity Act and Include Provisions in Emerging Tax Legislation

Senate and House champions have introduced the Historic Tax Credit Growth and Opportunity Act (H.R. 2941, S.1459). Led by Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-LA) and Sen. Mark Warner (D-VA) in the Senate and Rep. Darin LaHood (R-IL) and Rep. Tom Suozzi (D-NY) in the House, these bills include several provisions that will restore value to the Historic Tax Credit (HTC), improve access to the credit, make more projects eligible to use the credit, and boost the credit for smaller and rural rehabilitation projects. The bill includes the following provisions:

HTC-GO Provisions

• Returns to a 1-year delivery of Historic Tax Credits for all projects

• Eliminates the HTC Basis Adjustment, bringing more value to HTCs and making it easier to pair with the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit

• Reduces the substantial rehabilitation threshold from 100% to 50%, making more buildings eligible to use the HTC

• Modifies Tax Exempt Use Rules, making the credit easier to use by non-profits

• Increases the credit from 20% to 30% for small projects below $3.75 million

• Increases the credit from 20% to 30% for projects below $5 million in rural areas

• All small/rural projects are eligible for direct transfer

The federal HTC is the largest federal investment in historic preservation and a critical economic development tool used to revitalize our communities, create jobs, and preserve our heritage. Unfortunately, the HTC has not kept pace with other federal incentives and needs to be modernized. Additionally, over the past decade, HTCs have lost 25% of their investment value due to unfavorable IRS rulings, administrative burdens, and changes in the credit structure. The provisions in the HTC-GO Act would help restore the credit’s lost value and make the credit easier to use.

With a series of tax provisions expiring at the end of the year, one of the top priorities of Congress and the White House will be passing a large tax package. This provides a huge opportunity to ensure HTC provisions are included in the emerging tax bill. The House and Senate passed budget resolutions that clear the way to pass budget reconciliation bills, which could move early this summer. Advocates will also be paying close attention to any attempts to weaken the HTC as lawmakers seek cost-saving measures.

The voice of preservation advocates will be absolutely essential to make the case for enhancing the HTC, ensuring it is included as part of emerging tax legislation, and fending off any potential threats to diminish the credit.

We need your help!

Urge your Members of Congress to co-sponsor the bipartisan Historic Tax Credit Growth and Opportunity Act (H.R. 2941, S. 1459) and include HTC provisions in emerging tax legislation

If you have a personal contact in your Representative or Senators’ office, contact that person directly, especially if you just met with their office during Advocacy Week. Urge them to co-sponsor the Historic Tax Credit Growth and Opportunity Act (H.R. 2941, S. 1459). If they do not handle tax issues please ask that they pass the message along to the appropriate staff person. Preservation Action has also made it easy for you take action. Check out our action campaign to easily personalize and send a letter to your members of Congress and share this alert with your networks!

On February 13, the National Park Service removed all instances of the words Transgender and Queer from the Stonewall National Monument website, as well as other sites and resources referencing LGBTQ+ history. In 1999, Stonewall was the first site in the country listed on the National Register of Historic Places for its significance to LGBTQ+ history. We are proud that it is in New York State and was listed through the efforts of preservationists and the state historic preservation office.

The Stonewall National Monument, designated in 2016, is based on the boundaries established in this earlier nomination and is the first and only national park dedicated to LGBTQ+ history. The history of the Stonewall uprising is intertwined with the civil rights of the United States and all citizens. It demonstrates the power of activism by the full range of LGBTQ+ activists who rose up in June 1969, changing the trajectory of the LGBTQ+ rights movement. 

“Transgender and Queer participation cannot be erased and written out of the historical record like it never happened.”

As a preservation movement, we say in no uncertain terms that LGBTQ+ history is our history, and it needs to be amplified and celebrated. We choose not to remain silent while attempts are made to deny the existence of Trans people, both past and present. Revising the historical record for political purposes is dangerous and unacceptable.

The Preservation League of NYS stands for a preservation movement that is for everyone – a core tenet is promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion in all that we do. Denying or inventing history may make some feel more comfortable, but it is neither accurate nor constructive. Preserving and celebrating diverse histories is essential – whether that means preserving sites related to disability history or places that represent the immigrant experience, telling the stories of women’s history, honoring Asian American histories, amplifying the work of Transgender activists, supporting Latinx communities, or celebrating Black culture – all of it matters and we stand with our allies who continue to do this important work.

In New York State, we continue to preserve our past to work toward a more just and sustainable future. We count among our partners in this work the organizations listed below and many others. You have our word that together we will always seek to tell the full story of our shared history.

Click here for a PDF of this statement. We are happy to continue adding co-signers to this statement. Please reach out if your organization would like to be added.

This sign-on letter follows an earlier public comment from the League and our Preservation Colleagues, which you can find here. For a PDF of the December 13 letter, click here.

December 13, 2024
Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Sarah Bronin, Chair
401 F Street NW, Suite 308
Washington, DC 20001

Dear Chair Bronin:

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the revised Program Comment on Certain Housing, Building, and Transportation Activities. On behalf of the undersigned New York-based preservation nonprofit organizations, the Preservation Colleagues network, the Preservation League of New York State respectfully submits the following comments.

We appreciate that many of our concerns were addressed and that the document is easier to follow. We have no major concerns with the processes and activities covered under Appendix A of the revised Program Comment.

However, we remain concerned that State Historic Preservation Offices (SHPOs) are essentially cut out of the Section 106 process for any activities covered under Appendix B. We appreciate the gesture of adding the option for federal agencies to consult with the relevant SHPO (Appendix B, Section 1) but this is unlikely to occur in practice. By not consulting with SHPO, federal agencies and/or their consultants are left with little accountability and are left to make their own determinations regarding National Register eligibility.

The lack of notification requirements remains a concern as well. With respect to Dispute Resolution (Section VI), how and when would a member of the public, local government, SHPO, or other entity become aware of an undertaking? Without consultation requirements, how will there be any consulting parties?

Finally, the lack of notification requirements and the lack of SHPO input could result in the intentional or unintentional loss of historic resources and/or character defining features that have not yet been identified in surveys or listed in the National Register. This could disproportionately impact historically marginalized communities, which are generally less well documented.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Adirondack Architectural Heritage, Erin Tobin, Executive Director
Friends of the Upper East Side Historic Districts, Nuha Ansari, Executive Director
Historic Albany Foundation, Pamela Howard, Executive Director
Historic Districts Council, Frampton Tolbert, Executive Director
Historic Ithaca, Susan Holland, Executive Director
Landmark Society of Western New York, Wayne Goodman, Executive Director
New York Landmarks Conservancy, Peg Breen, President
Preservation Association of Central New York, Nicole M. Fragnito, Executive Director
Preservation Buffalo Niagara, Bernice Radle, Executive Director
Preservation League of New York State, Jay DiLorenzo, President
Preservation Long Island, Tara Cubie, Preservation Director
Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation, Samantha Bosshart, Executive Director
TAP Inc., Barb Nelson, AIA, Executive Director
Village Preservation, Andrew Berman, Executive Director

The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) is developing a Program Comment on Accessible, Climate-Resilient, Connected Communities that aims to provide federal agencies with an alternate way to comply with their responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. In doing so, ACHP invited public comment on their proposal. Along with 13 of our Preservation Colleague organizations across the state, the following letter was sent to ACHP in response to their proposed Program Comment on Accessible, Climate-Resilient and Connected Communities. Click here for a PDF of this letter.

---

Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
Sarah Bronin, Chair
401 F Street NW, Suite 308
Washington, DC 20001

Dear Chair Bronin:

We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the draft Program Comment on Accessible, Climate-Resilient and Connected Communities. On behalf of the undersigned New York-based preservation nonprofit organizations, the Preservation Colleagues network, we respectfully submit the following comments.

We recognize the need to streamline the Section 106 consultation process in certain areas and appreciate that the ACHP is focusing on housing and climate. As preservation organizations, we advocate for affordable housing projects, climate resilience and sustainability in the built environment, and transportation alternatives. It is imperative that the preservation movement promote these efforts and communicate the essential role that preservation plays in advancing more resilient and equitable communities.

However, we are concerned that the draft Program Comment is too broad in scope and places too much responsibility on federal agencies and/or their consultants to review their own undertakings. As such, it runs counter to the intent of the National Historic Preservation Act and risks irreparably harming the nation’s historic resources. Specific comments are as follows:

• We support streamlining the Section 106 process and agree that many of the project types included in the Program Comment are sensible. Projects that are unlikely to impact historic resources—such as electrifying appliances, replacing non-historic playground equipment, or replacing asphalt surfacing, to name a few—should indeed be exempted from the standard Section 106 review process.

• For projects with potential adverse effects, we do not support removing SHPO (and other consulting parties) from the Section 106 process. Federal agencies should not be given full decision-making power over their own projects. Many of the project types in the Program Comment require nuanced consideration by an experienced preservation professional (or a person recognized by the relevant Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian Organization to have expertise, where appropriate). SHPO staff provide objective assessment and have extensive experience reviewing potential impacts and applying the SOI Standards. For many project types, they are best suited—alongside design professionals and project sponsors— to explore creative solutions that accomplish the dual goals of preserving character defining features while also providing affordable housing and/or advancing climate goals.

• We want to see a re-evaluation of project types that would be covered by the Program Comment, in consultation with SHPO staff. Of particular concern is the exemption of building exteriors, including windows, doors, and the use of substitute materials. Both primary and secondary elevations should remain subject to the standard Section 106 process.

• We recommend a revision to the definition of housing to support the preservation and production of affordable housing. The current definition makes no mention of affordability; presumably the Program Comment could apply to any undertaking that involves housing, regardless of ownership or affordability.

• The lack of notification requirements is concerning and could result in the intentional or unintentional loss of historic resources and/or character defining features that have not yet been identified in surveys or listed in the National Register. This could disproportionately impact historically marginalized communities, which are generally less well documented.

• We also want to see a shorter initial duration of the Program Comment and do not support unilateral extension of the duration by the Chair.

• We strongly recommend more robust reporting requirements, including an annual report from participating federal agencies of all undertakings covered by the Program Comment, particularly in the first years that the Program Comment is in effect. Reporting should include in-depth evaluation by ACHP with input from preservation partners such as SHPOs and nonprofit preservation organizations.

• Overall, we are concerned that the broad scope of this Program Comment sends the message that preservation is an obstacle to affordable housing and climate solutions. Modern preservation best practices actively promote both. Often, the treatment that meets the SOI Standards is, in the long term, the more economical and sustainable treatment and provides building occupants with an enhanced quality of life.

While we support streamlining the Section 106 process in principle and support many of the exemptions included in the Program Comment, we do not believe that the current draft achieves an equitable balance between streamlining review processes, protecting historic resources, and providing public input in federal undertakings. Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Adirondack Architectural Heritage, Erin Tobin, Executive Director
Friends of the Upper East Side Historic Districts, Nuha Ansari, Executive Director
Historic Albany Foundation, Pamela Howard, Executive Director
Historic Districts Council, Frampton Tolbert, Executive Director
Historic Ithaca, Susan Holland, Executive Director
Landmark Society of Western New York, Wayne Goodman, Executive Director
New York Landmarks Conservancy, Peg Breen, President
Preservation Association of Central New York, Nicole M. Fragnito, Executive Director
Preservation Buffalo Niagara, Bernice Radle, Executive Director
Preservation League of New York State, Jay DiLorenzo, President
Preservation Long Island, Tara Cubie, Preservation Director
Saratoga Springs Preservation Foundation, Samantha Bosshart, Executive Director
TAP Inc., Barb Nelson, AIA, Executive Director
Village Preservation, Andrew Berman, Executive Director

This advocacy alert is reposted from The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation.

America is suffering from a massive shortage of available housing units, and the crisis is particularly acute regarding affordable housing. Reusing existing buildings is integral to addressing this critical problem, and - since about 40 percent of America’s buildings are at least 50 years old - rehabilitating historic housing and adapting historic buildings not originally built for housing is essential. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation is developing a policy statement on housing and historic preservation to provide expert advice to a wide range of stakeholders on the role that historic preservation can play in alleviating the housing crisis.

A draft of the policy statement on housing and historic preservation is available for public comment. Comments must be submitted in writing by 5 p.m. on November 11, 2023, by emailing housing@achp.gov. Comments received will be considered as the draft policy statement is finalized. (All comments are subject to the Freedom of Information Act and/or may be made public.)

The draft policy statement provides advice to all levels of government, community groups, nonprofit organizations, developers, and others in the private sector regarding the importance of: gathering information relating to historic preservation and housing; reusing historic buildings; accelerating project permitting and environmental review; education; and collaboration.

The draft policy statement builds upon and incorporates key principles of the ACHP’s 2007 Affordable Housing and Historic Preservation Policy Statement, which focuses principally on review of affordable housing projects under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. Portions of the 2007 policy statement appear (with revisions) in Policy Principle #9 of the current draft.

This Advocacy Update has been reposted from our colleagues at Preservation Action.

Last month, Rep. Mike Kelly (R-PA) and Rep. Brian Higgins (D-NY) introduced the Neighborhood Homes Investment Act (H.R. 3940, S. 657) in the House. Companion legislation was introduced in the Senate earlier this year. This bill would create a federal tax credit to encourage revitalization of distressed homes. In many parts of the country, the cost of purchasing and renovating a home is greater than the value of the home's sale price. The bill would create a tax credit to cover the cost between building or rehabilitating a home in these areas and the price at which they can be sold, up to 35% of the total development cost. Similar legislation was introduced during the last Congress and garnered significant bipartisan support.

The bill focuses on communities with the greatest need, by targeting distressed areas. This includes neighborhoods with high poverty rates, incomes below the area median income; and home values that are below the metro or state median value. The Neighborhood Homes Coalition put together an interactive map where you can see what neighborhoods could qualify for funding. The Coalition estimates that the bill could lead to 500,000 homes over 10 years being rehabilitated or constructed.

This legislation has the potential to significantly assist owners of historic and older homes. Preservation Action will continue to monitor this important legislation.

This advocacy alert is reposted from our colleagues at Preservation Action 

Urgent action is needed to advance the National Heritage Area Act of 2021 (S. 1942, H.R. 1316). This important bill would create a much-needed uniform system to reauthorize National Heritage Areas, allocate standard funding, and provide universal standards to how current and future National Heritage Areas (NHAs) are managed and designated. This bill would reauthorize and provide certainty for the 55 current NHAs, including reauthorizing 30 NHAs that are in immediate need and establish 5 new ones. NHAs produce nearly $13 billion in annual economic impact and every dollar in federal funding is matched by an average of $5.50 from other funding sources.

The National Heritage Area Act was advanced by the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee with strong, bipartisan support and was added to the Senate Calendar for the current legislative session. This does not mean the Senate will get to it and time is running out, as Congress needs to take action before the end of the year.

Take action! Urge your Representative and Senators to support the National Heritage Area Act and include it as part of any omnibus package. Check out the Alliance of National Heritage Areas to learn more about National Heritage Areas and this important bill. 

Cross-posted from our colleagues at the National Trust Community Investment Corporation, a subsidiary of the National Trust for Historic Preservation

Thank you to all the advocates who reached out to congressional offices, led local meetings, and hosted tours of HTC projects in August! At this critical time, we continue to gain support for the HTC-GO, with 97 House members and 14 Senators cosponsoring the bill. We are steadily approaching our goal of 100 cosponsors in the House and 20 cosponsors in the Senate!

As the 117th Congress winds down, members of Congress will head home in October ahead of the November elections. Depending on the outcome of the elections, Congress will determine whether it will be an active lame-duck session or if it will limit activity to organizing for the new Congress. Scores of federal tax incentives have expired or will expire in 2022, resulting in growing interest from Republicans and Democrats to extend these tax provisions.

Year-end legislation may be a vehicle for HTC improvements. Building support for the HTC-GO now will pave a path for success when year-end legislative vehicles begin to move, possibly during a lame-duck session of Congress.

With about seven remaining weeks until the election, advocates are encouraged to do the following:

1. Use the National Trust E-advocacy tool to contact offices to request cosponsorship of the Historic Tax Credit Growth and Opportunity Act (HTC-GO, HR 2294/S. 2266)

2. Look for opportunities to meet with legislators when they are back home in October. Please connect with Senators and Representatives back home to request cosponsorship of HTC-GO. We encourage you to safely attend upcoming political events and gatherings to discuss the HTC-GO bill. As many did in August, you can also proactively schedule a time to meet with legislators for a meeting or a tour of a local HTC project, especially projects that will become easier to undertake with the HTC if the proposed changes are enacted.

Take Action:

1. Request cosponsorship through the National Trust for Historic Preservation's E-Advocacy tool.

2. Review the HTC-GO fact sheets to stay informed:

   1. House HTC-GO (HR 2294) Fact Sheet

   2. Senate HTC-GO (S. 2266) Fact Sheet

3. Search local and political events or join a local political party's email list to learn about events your members of Congress might be attending.

4. Invite your members of Congress to tour successful historic preservation projects. Take a look at the National Trust's guide to arranging a site visit.

5. Email Michael Phillips (mphillips@ntcic.com) to receive the schedulers' email addresses for your members of Congress and for additional assistance in making your request.

6. Check to see if your members of Congress have already cosponsored:

   1. House HTC-GO Cosponsors

   2. Senate HTC-GO Cosponsors

Talking Points for Discussions with your Members of Congress:

• "Now is the time to strengthen this proven incentive to address the slowdown and challenges in rehabilitation projects across the country."

• "Would you please cosponsor House Bill H.R. 2294/Senate Bill S. 2266-The Historic Tax Credit Growth and Opportunity Act (HTC-GO) and work to include these provisions in year-end legislation?" If the legislator has already cosponsored the bill, thank them instead of asking them to cosponsor.

• Explain how enacting these provisions would benefit your community.

  • For HTC-GO provision talking points, click here.

• Please share the "State of the Historic Rehabilitation Industry" and either the House HTC-GO Fact Sheet or the Senate HTC-GO Fact Sheet as printed handouts or links/attachments as a follow-up.

Resources

• HTC State Maps and Project Lists

Thank you for your advocacy! For assistance in contacting the offices of your members of Congress, please contact us at the email addresses below.

Mike Phillips mphillips@ntcic.com
Shaw Sprague ssprague@savingplaces.org
Patrick Robertson probertson@confluencegr.com

Shared from our colleagues at Preservation Action:

Preservation Action is excited announce the launch of our 2022 Congressional Candidate Historic Preservation Survey. For the fourth time, Preservation Action is surveying U.S House and Senate candidates across the country to gauge support of key national preservation programs and policies. We plan to share the results of the survey widely before the Midterm elections in November. We conducted a candidate survey prior to the 2016, 2018, and 2020 elections and received hundreds of responses. We are excited to hear from even more candidates this year and will be working with our network of state and local preservation organizations to help spread the word.

The goal of the survey is multi-faceted; to educate congressional candidates on the federal historic preservation program, gauge their level of support for critically important preservation programs and policies, educate PA members and supporters on the candidates positions and gain useful insights into congressional candidates background with historic preservation. Using the results of our Grassroots Survey as a guide, the survey asks the following questions:

1. Do you support stable and robust funding for the Historic Preservation Fund?

2. Would you support efforts to permanently reauthorize and enhance the Historic Preservation Fund?

3. Would you support efforts to update the Federal Rehabilitation Tax Credit (HTC) program?

4. Would you support policies that assure the impact to historic and cultural resources continue to be considered in the federal project planning process?

5. Does historic preservation play an important role in your state/district? How so? Describe any personal connections to historic preservation or historic sites. Is there a specific historic place in your district that is important to you and your constituents?

Help support this important work by following up with congressional candidates in your state, urging them to complete Preservation Action’s 2022 Congressional Candidate Survey. A copy of the survey and letter are available here. A list of contact information for congressional candidates (divided by state) is available here. Candidates that have already responded are highlighted in yellow.